Talk:Netcracker Technology

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Conflict of Interest Problems

This article has obvious conflict of interest problems, having been edited primarily by anonymous users making edits that seem to break WP:NPOV policies. These edits tend to cite Netcracker’s public website quite a lot. If you’re interested in Wikipedia’s definition of COI, please take a read at What is Conflict of Interest?.

As stated on WP:COI, “COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. It undermines public confidence and risks causing public embarrassment to the individuals and companies being promoted.” — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 04:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After spending the weekend editing, I believe I have resolved most of the problems noted above, updated and verified the citations throughout, added a couple new sections, and heavily redacted several WP:NPOV wording problems. Hopefully, I’ve improved the page. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 04:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NEC citation removed

@B8dreamlife, why did you remove the citation to this notice? It was a valid press release by the company initiating the acquisition. You will find that this source is completely acceptable to cite based on the self-source policy — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 18:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buzzword

@Mean as custard, do you have a recommended word to replace solution(s)? — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 17:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Software. . .products. . .services. . .devices. . .hardware - it all depends on the context. "Solutions" is meaningless . . Mean as custard (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So instead of IT solutions we might say software and technical support? Seems wordy, but probably less buzzy sounding. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 20:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mean as custard, I took a stab at rewording and removed most buzzwords. Interested in your thoughts. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 05:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simple changes, but they make a big improvement. Only two stray 'solutions' remaining. . .Mean as custard (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done... How do you feel about putting the awards back into the article. I found it also listed on other companies (randomly), like Amdocs for instance. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 20:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]