Talk:Nepotism (The Office)

Nepotism (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 15, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nepotism (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 talk 23:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review sometime today or tomorrow. Ruby2010 talk 23:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

Please add links to the characters' articles in the lead
Add how many viewers the episode had to the lead
In the end the backfired prank does impress Jim.[2] Why is this cited? Is it a controversial comment? (I like The Office, but haven't seen this particular episode yet).
Add how Daniel Chun and Jeffrey Blitz relate to the show (are they producers, writers etc?)
Kevin Fitzpatrick of UGO Networks was a good episode, but not an especially important one which failed to advance any ongoing story lines. Word missing.
Reference 19 needs production fix ("Tvbythenumbers" should be consistent among all refs).

The article was a pleasure to read, and I truly didn't find much wrong with it. Just edit accordingly to my suggestions above, respond back on this page, and the article will be good to go. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 01:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'm placing the article on hold for seven days (though I'm sure it will be fixed much sooner). Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 01:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All points addressed; thanks for the review. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to go. Passed for GA. Good work, Ruby2010 talk 05:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nepotism (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nepotism (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nepotism (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926030051/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/09/the-office-premiere-the-good-the-bad-and-the-wuphf.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/09/the-office-premiere-the-good-the-bad-and-the-wuphf.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]