Talk:Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Nephrology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nephrology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Article Assessment for WikiProject Medicine

Hello. I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct template(s) on this talk page for verification. Upon reviewed of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:

Assess article with class and importance factors

I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup June 2010

Just a drive-by cleanup tagging; the text of the article portion does not flow well and there are some formatting issues in the opening paragraphs. Then there is the wall of text that follows the laid-out article. en jaksannut. 96.52.153.159 (talk) 03:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed diabetes mellitus as a cause of diabetes insipidus and highlighted that it is a seperate condition that shares some symptoms —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.199.59 (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don´t think you understand. My writing was -

Sometimes the concentation ability is så impaired that hydronephrosis and hydroureter follows damaging the kidneys även more. ^hydronephrosis and hydrourter hydronephrosis and hydrourter in diabetes insipidus congenital. In those cases (inborn) [1]

with sources etc and you just revert`it ? Easy ! What credentials do yo have ? Just your IP.jmak (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Endocrine reviews

doi:10.1210/er.2012-1044 JFW | T@lk 21:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090401234459/http://diabetesinsipidus.org/4_types_nephrogenic_di.htm to http://www.diabetesinsipidus.org/4_types_nephrogenic_di.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]