Talk:Nepenthes rajah/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 13:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a few minor changes to the lead; but it is in very good shape and is conforms to guidelines. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 14:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is quite lengthy, and removing some of the pictures may help to truncate it - at least in terms of layout. Therefore I have removed a couple of the pictures - they can be exchanged for a present one in the article if needbe, but I would council against incorporating more image. I have also removed some of the subsections which also needlessly extended the article (such as leaves, flowers). These are unnecessary as the lead-into the paragraph sufficiently identifies the focus at hand. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 15:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article exhibits overlinking - unless terms are unfamiliar or directly bare upon the subject, they should generally not be linked. Well known geographical places do not need to be linked, such as France, nor do well known animals, such as mice, ants, etc. I have addressed this matter per WP:OVERLINK.

However, the article is very good and certainly of GA quality.✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 15:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are alot of images in this article, and they really do clutter it up. I have taken the liberty of removing some (but they still remain in the page code so can be restored). More could still be removed. I would suggest, therefore, as most of them are pertinent to the article, that a gallery be created and most of the images put in there to be viewed. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 15:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]