Talk:Nepean Highway

Australia: Melbourne / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nepean Highway is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Australian Roads: Victoria Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Victoria

This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add |needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

Untitled

It reduces to six lanes at Moorabbin and then to the 60 km/h four-lane single carriageway after the notorious roundabouts at Mordialloc And let's not forget where it then goes to a single lane each way across Mordialloc Creek! Yuck. --Commking 05:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nepean Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080723231551/http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/Home/RoadsAndProjects/RoadProjects/SouthEasternSuburbs/NepeanHighwayMordiallocCreekBridgeMordialloc.htm to http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/Home/RoadsAndProjects/RoadProjects/SouthEasternSuburbs/NepeanHighwayMordiallocCreekBridgeMordialloc.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed number

Before 2013, NSW road articles had the hatnote "Proposed ___ to replace __" inside the infobox. How about we do that here as well instead of just deleting people's changes? Jordf32123 (talk) 09:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordf32123 (talk • contribs)

If you can find a reliable source that confirms the proposed route for that road, and cite that source as a reference, then sure, add that to the infobox. But until those conditions are met, then no, as it's speculation otherwise. Lordstorm (talk) 01:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]