Talk:Nepal–Britain Treaty of 1923

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 21, 2013, December 21, 2014, December 21, 2016, December 21, 2021, and December 21, 2022.

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Empire

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Feels like reading an indian "fantasy" version of history. "Great achievement of 25 years of Chandra Shumsher"? "Great achievement" considered by who? indians?? 90% of people in Nepal have no idea that Chandra Shumsher had even signed this treaty. Pick-up any high-school level history book in Nepal, and see where this so-called "great-achievement" of Nepal figures. It doesn't. There is absolutely no-mention of this in any high-school level history book in Nepal. The entire fulcrum of Nepali history revolves around Sugaulli-treaty of 1816, not this unknown or little known treaty of 1923. Providing Nepali and British view-point on this treaty would perhaps make the article more neutral. Plus, half of the indian-nonsense gibberish make the page undigestible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.79.225.250 (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, thank you for your comment. This is the first time I came back to Wikipedia in years. So, to start with, I was literally 13 years old when I wrote this article which I mostly translated from sources in library in Bhrikutimandap and through the usage of cyber cafes, so apologize my style of writing. Having said that the first part is, nonetheless, still cited so if you want to know who it is considered such by, please refer to the book and if you can non-fantasize is, please do so, I would gladly welcome it. Also referring to high schools in Nepal, for as long as I was in Nepal, there were no history books in Nepal at all, except for one titled "Social Studies" which had but a few pages of various past civilizations and a few pages of the history of Nepal during the Rana period, and then a few about after the end of the Rana regime so I really have no clue what you are referring to. Shirsakbc (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese tributary state becomes British tributary as well?

Nepal paid tribute to China in 1792, 1794, 1795, 1823, 1842, and 1865.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tributary_states_of_China#Qing

So, was this so-called "British minister" in Nepal and not an envoy like the indian wishful-fantasy history says, aware for all those years that Nepal was paying tributes to the Qing's?

Proof

Where is the proof of signed document please update we are waiting SNP1987 (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing sources

At least one of the links looks broken. Reliable sources seem missing Itssoover (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]