This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– There have been significant taxonomic revisions in Neophocaena over the last decade. Neophocaena, which was formerly a monotypic genus known as the finless porpoise, is now known to contain up to 3 different species, all of which have "finless porpoise" in their names. However, the original species classified in Neophocaena presently is referred to as just "finless porpoise", despite the fact that based on its range and all the taxonomic authorities, it should be the "Indo-Pacific finless porpoise", with "finless porpoise" being the generic genus name. N. asiaorientalis asiaorientalis is now considered a distinct species on its own, and in any case it should be referred to with its common name, Yangtze finless porpoise. "Narrow-ridged finless porpoise" was a term for N. asiaeorientalis back when it contained both the Yangtze and East Asian species, but with both species split, the other species should be renamed "East Asian finless porpoise" as per the taxonomic authorities, and "Narrow-ridge finless porpoise" should become a disambiguation.Geekgecko (talk) 06:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me, provided the common species names are in reasonably frequent use (if not, would suggest moving the genus to "finless porpoise" and keeping the species at scientific). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, all three names are accepted by the ASM MammalDiversity Database and seem to be in frequent use when finless porpoises are thought to be multiple species. "Narrow-ridged finless porpoise" is used more often than "East Asian finless porpoise", but "narrow-ridged finless porpoise" refers to the combination of East Asian and Yangtze porpoises (considered conspecific until recently), so I'd make that a disambiguation with both pages.Geekgecko (talk) 16:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I hope. This felt uncomfortably like juggling eggs :p I think the various immediate redirects are all fine, but it probably produced a number of double redirects that I haven't hunted down. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done, I hope. This felt uncomfortably like juggling eggs :p I think the various immediate redirects are all fine, but it probably produced a number of double redirects that I haven't hunted down. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)