Talk:Neopaganism in Australia
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 24 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Modern paganism in Australia. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 24 March 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 16:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Neopaganism in Australia → Modern paganism in Australia – Consitency with Modern paganism and spread pages such as Modern paganism in the United Kingdom and Modern paganism in Scandinavia. Ingwina (talk) 08:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 08:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. I'm not sure that Modern paganism is located at the correct title. Looking at the Google Ngrams it looks like "neopaganism" is much more common of a term. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, due to WP:PRECISION; and as I argue at Talk:Modern paganism#Requested move 24 March 2023, that title also should go back to "neo-paganism": there are "modern pagans" who are NOT "neo-pagans"... but these articles' topics are the latter. Also, concur with Rreagan007. – •Raven .talk 07:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Just as I mentioned elsewhere, I think your point here actually is that it should be consistent, just that the main page should change to the name you prefer, which would then be consistent with the name of this page. The other page has just had a discussion to change to "Neopaganism", where I saw you made this point, and the verdict was to remain as it is - as "Modern paganism". I think your point is most relevant to the main page but I don't think it supports using one name here and another one there i.e. for this page to not have a consistent title with the main page as its name currently stands. I think we should use one name across the board for page titles but which name that is should be discussed on the main page, as it was last week. Ingwina (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Australia has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Neopaganism has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support for consistency and per nom. The RM for Modern paganism was closed; it was not moved to "neo...". — BarrelProof (talk) 05:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.