Jump to content

Talk:Neonatal Resuscitation Program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Rejecting this merge given the consensus that the topic has priority to an educational program on the topic. Edanziger (talk) 19:24, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Neonatal resuscitation into Neonatal Resuscitation Program. I think that the content in the Neonatal resuscitation article can easily be explained in the context of Neonatal Resuscitation Program, and the Neonatal Resuscitation Program article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Foo will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Cerevisae (talk) 22:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose (I would support a reverse merge into neonatal resuscitation though). Neonatal resuscitation is an independently notable concept that warrants its own article. It would be the primary article if both articles were to exist in the same page. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The primary topic is neonatal resuscitation, while the Neonatal Resuscitation Program is an educational resource focused on this topic. --Edanziger (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.