Talk:Neolithic creolisation hypothesis

Merge

I am still waiting for an explanation why this article should be merged with Broad homeland hypothesis. The area involved in the creolization process does not necessarily relate exactly to the Broad homeland territory.Rokus01 (talk) 20:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, what is the hypothesis?

Is it just me, or is there not a single sentence or paragraph which explains what the hypothesis actually states?

Granted, as I've no degree in anthro or linguistics, much of the language in this article is a little over my head, but I think I can break it down into several sections. The first paragraph explains what the hypothesis explains (the source of the Indo-European languages). The second paragraph explains the hypothesis' basis and compares it with other hypotheses. The third paragraph shows some evidence for the hypothesis (which is meaningless without knowing what they are trying to prove). The remaining paragraphs appear to discuss related and alternate theories.

Also, although the first paragraph implies that the hypothesis explains the source of the IE languages, it appears that much of the rest of the article is talking about more archaeological information. 69.95.237.55 (talk) 22:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned / links

I linked to this article from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.44.120.114 (talk) 14:21, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Neolithic creolisation hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]