Talk:Nennius
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discussion
[edit]"Nennius the proto-Wikipedian: Discuss." (The identity of wiki-writers can be equally obscure, and articles can be "heaps of all that has been found", verifiable or otherwise) Jackiespeel (talk) 17:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Nice one! 124.120.212.108 (talk) 15:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
That's an interesting connection. I think many of these post-roman British historians might as well have prefaced their works with "What I Know Is".--121.218.37.232 (talk) 11:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Somewhat vague statements
[edit]Like " Some experts say that this was not the first compiled history of the Britons " As Harrison says of De Excidio Gildas " did not write history[...] in the sense that Gregory of Tours did" - but that is not to say he did not write history. And certainly he wrote using more sources than his first hand own knowledge, does this, then, make De Excido (part I) a "compiled history"? What are we trying to convey here? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC).
- No real clue - I just maintain the article - it's very low down on my interest scale. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Nennius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080907061426/http://www.britishhistoryclub.com/bhc/sources/nennius_hb.html to http://www.britishhistoryclub.com/bhc/sources/nennius_hb.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- High-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
- Low-importance Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
- All WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms pages
- C-Class Wales articles
- Low-importance Wales articles
- WikiProject Wales articles