Talk:Nen-ryū

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Japan: Sport Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:07, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Sport task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Separate Maniwa nen-ryu and Nen-ryu articles?

Is there a good reason for us not to merge the Maniwa Nen-ryu and Nen-ryu articles?--Mateo2006 20:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only good reasons would be that although I believe Nen-ryu essentially ceased to exist when it was "renamed", the names are separated by over 200 years, and there are other arts whose lineage is specifically tied to the older name. For example, Kamiizumi Nobutsuna specifically studied Nen-ryu (because he lived in the early 16th century, and Maniwa Nen-ryu wasn't "founded" until the very end of the 16th century). I think that this is unlike Yagyu Shinkage-ryu, which was renamed within a single generation, by the founder's very first student. Bradford44 20:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 21:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Hello Patar knight -- You assert that there are sources in books to support this article. This is the same implicit assertion as has existed for ten years. Nonetheless, the article stood original research for all that time. At what point is the article to be doubted? Our readers have an expectation that the content is factual and backed up by secondary sources. A claim that sources exist gets old after ten years. I reject the WP:NODEADLINE argument after a decade. If you disagree, then tell me please, what time frame you would propose. Rhadow (talk) 15:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's literally possible to prove the assumption that reliable sources should exist by doing a Google Books search that takes no more than 30 seconds. And then taking a couple extra minutes to filter the results and identify the books which are from reputable authors/publishing houses.[1] [2][3][4] The deadline lies somewhere between WP:NODEADLINE and WP:DEADLINENOW, but nominating pages on obviously notable topics solely because there are no sources in the article should not happen (see: WP:NEXIST). For most notable subjects, it's possible for you to find reliable sources yourself and add them to the article, instead of nominating them for deletion and wasting everyone's time. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 07:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]