Talk:Nema Kunku

Africa: Gambia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The Gambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Gambia (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the Gambia may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Proposed split

There are at least two, possibly three, settlements in the Gambia called Nema Kunku, and this article has mixed up all of them.

One in Kombo North district with 28,651 inhabitants in 2013, according to the census (p. 3). "it is found near Gambia's largest town Serekunda" refers to that place.
One in Upper Niumi district with 1,099 inhabitants in 2013, according to the census (p. 26). The coordinates in this article refer to that place.
One in Foni Jarrol district according to GeoNames. Google Maps calls it Jorem Nema Kunku but this name doesn't seem to be on other maps. It's unclear which, if any, settlement in the census it corresponds to. GeoNames is partly user-generated and therefore unreliable. I'm part of a project in Swedish-language Wikipedia cleaning up and sourcing Lsjbot articles, and we have generally concluded that GeoNames can't be trusted on its own. I think I have seen a similar analysis here, but I can't find it now.

At least the first two settlements seem notable and sourceable enough for separate articles, but I would appreciate input from others. // Essin (talk) 09:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On closer inspection, it seems that the coordinates as stated point to settlement 1, but (at least for me) the pushpin map in the infobox seems to point to settlement 2. This might be a template issue. // Essin (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]