Talk:Neither Here nor There (Fringe)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 04:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruby, I'd be glad to take this one. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. Thanks as always for your work on these! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

This is quite strong and clearly ripe for promotion--thanks for your work on it! I've noted two small suggestions about the prose below.

"They are then informed of the suspect's location" -- who is "they" here?
"COTW-er, complete with Freak-Meet" -- this gets a bit jargony for the casual reader. I'm not sure if the best solution here is to overwrite part of the quotation with bracketed text, add parenthetical text, add an explanatory footnote maybe? -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Both comments addressed. Let me know if there's anything else! Ruby 2010/2013 02:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~Very small clarity issues noted above.~~ Spotchecks show no copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass