Talk:Neighborhood Watch (White Collar)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Wikilink "Third season" in the leadSources aren't need in the lead. I'd move [4] down to the "Ratings" sectionI would break up the production section into two paragraphs, right before ""Neighborhood Watch" was written by Jeff F. King, his first writing credit..."Do you have a citation to state who directed what? Maybe just cite the episode itselfItalicize The A.V. Club in Ref. No. 4
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The picture in the infobox needs a better caption/rationale
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for seven days to straighten out the issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- I pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)