Jump to content

Talk:Neighborhood Watch (White Collar)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Wikilink "Third season" in the lead
    Sources aren't need in the lead. I'd move [4] down to the "Ratings" section
    I would break up the production section into two paragraphs, right before ""Neighborhood Watch" was written by Jeff F. King, his first writing credit..."
    Do you have a citation to state who directed what? Maybe just cite the episode itself
    Italicize The A.V. Club in Ref. No. 4
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The picture in the infobox needs a better caption/rationale
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days to straighten out the issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]