Talk:Ned Herrmann
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
GE
[edit]Does anyone know when GE sponsored the HBDI? Also when did William Herrmann leave GE? This has particulra relevance to those of us more interested in the pragmatic than in science as Jack Welch would have had an influence if it was during his time. LookingGlass (talk) 16:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I checked here. Jack Welch became a senior vice president of GE in 1977 and vice chairman in 1979. He became chairman and CEO in 1982. This would seem at first sight to coincide with Herrmann's work there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LookingGlass (talk • contribs) 16:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]Shall we delete this page now? I have added relevant biographical info to the HBDI page.
- no, I merged it back here (1 year later) to even out the article, and because biographical information is off topic on the HBDI page. Danski14 21:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Deletion shouldn't be ruled out. Article lacks clear case for notability. If not remedied after a month or two, would make sense to merge back and axe this. MrZaiustalk 07:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- The case for notability is the HBDI. Like it or not the model is receiving increased publicity and seems to me to be no less valid by any measure than the MBTI. His background is therefroe of interest to those interested in the model. That statement does not conttradict what I say below. LookingGlass (talk) 16:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Deletion shouldn't be ruled out. Article lacks clear case for notability. If not remedied after a month or two, would make sense to merge back and axe this. MrZaiustalk 07:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- I would prefer the article to remain. It could be improved but I am interested in this subject and I don't see any overbearing logical need to consolidate. William Herrmann is a real person as well as the "inventor" of the HBDI. I would like to hear more about him not less. Also, I don't think the personal details of the author should be of more than tangential interest to the HBDI. That must sink or swim on its merits not on personality nor even on background. E=MC2 if I write it or a physics prof writes it and Einstein was considered a nut for a long time! I have taken out the first request for a citation as the necessary refernce is given immediately after that. He is clearly "known" for his work as he has been honoured for it. LookingGlass (talk) 16:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)