Talk:Neath and Tennant Canal/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]I've had a quick read of the article, and I believe that it should make GA-status states this time round.
I'm now working my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. This step is likely to day a day or so and this appears to be a comprehensive article. I may fix any "trivial problems" as I go through the article, and if so I might not list them here. Pyrotec (talk) 19:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
There was very litle that I needed to do: I added some convert templates (to satisfy the "metric poice") and a few wikilinks. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Yes: with photographs taken by the Nominator.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an informative article, which (obviously) involved a previous site visit. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)