Jump to content

Talk:Navy of the Independent State of Croatia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 04:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Section 1;
    • It consisted of seven river stations – at Sisak; suggest an emdash instead of en dash
    • Above suggestion follows for "two river gunboats – Ustaša and Bosut" and "two river minelayers – Zagreb and Zrinski"
  • Section 2;
    • numbering only 1,262 in September 1943; what is this count? men, ships or material?
    • MTB; mention in full on the first instant
    • 8 September 1944, 31 December 1944, December 1944; the year may be dropped per MOS:DATEVAR
  • Section 3;
    • Link the ranks Commander and Captain
  • Section 4; equivalent modern day ranks for Kontraadmiral and Kapetan Bojnogbroda
  • 9.9% violation unlikely.
  • All images are licensed well, with appropriate information of designs.
  • External links are good and no dab links found.
Well done, excellent article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, Krishna. All done, I made them all spaced ndashes for consistency. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]