Talk:Navdatoli

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: Madhya Pradesh

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh.

Untitled

This is a new article, meaning everything here is original and was added by myself. Roccoisagoodboy (talk) 18:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Roccoisagoodboy.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Number 2 for the Lithic ProductionIndianarchknowitall (talk) 02:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

There was a variety of information presented which is great but you were missing one more source for the lithic production section (for a total of 3 sources). The sentence structure could use further revision. This is especially true for the first sentence of the paragraph. It can be hard to keep up with what is being explained. Overall, you did a great job! I couldn't tell which was your work and what was someone else's but the whole page looks really nice and the picture of the pottery was a nice touch. Indianarchknowitall (talk) 02:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I think you did a great job! I really like the four sources that you used along with the map that you added in. Very helpful for those that might not be experienced in Indian Archaeology or archaeology for that matter. Great Job! GrayAlaina97 (talk) 18:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review 3

I enjoyed that you included information on the lithic production and mentioned how the material culture reflected the people at the site. Very informative. However, I would check some of your word choices and sentence structure. It sounds a little choppy and could flow better. Overall, great article. Coffeemate123 (talk) 20:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I feel as though your article was informative. The only suggestion is that your used the work "Distinct" three sentences in a row, and it was somewhat distracting. I understood the info, and it might just be me, but it was something I noticed.

The last sentence of "Lithic production" is also missing an 's' on the end of "site."Csmith4567s (talk) 02:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]