Talk:Navarre Beach, Florida

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Navarre, Florida High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Navarre, Florida, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Navarre, Florida on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Navarre, FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject Navarre, FloridaTemplate:WikiProject Navarre, FloridaNavarre, Florida articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Hurricanes

Hurricanes Katrina & Gustav also affected the area. I added them to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.207.209.16 (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why Me Lord?!

Wishing I knew a little bit more about healthcare reform! Where's the Humana South when u need it? Isn't that military/Gov Insurance?? Signed, Lost InTranslation Nola44 (talk) 05:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Navarre Beach, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110109023233/http://www.santarosa.fl.gov/navarre/pier.html to http://www.santarosa.fl.gov/navarre/pier.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Census-designated place

I have undone the merge of Navarre Beach with Navarre, Florida. The practice in Wikipedia is to have a separate article for each census-designated place in the U.S. In this case, while Navarre Beach shares a ZIP Code with Navarre, the U.S. Census Bureau maintains a complete set of population and demographic statistics that are separate from the statistics for Navarre, indicating that planners and others in the region see at as a community with enough distinct characteristics as to let it stand alone. While it is perfectly fine to claim that Navarre Beach is a neighborhood of Navarre, it's actually a moot point since neither community is incorporated. --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unmerge?

So looking back, I'm seeing that the discussion confirming merging this page with the Navarre, Florida page was skewed because of some sockpuppet activity [for full transparency, this was a terrible mistake on my part when I was 15 (this was 6 years ago) and did not realize the seriousness behind sockpuppeting, I went through the investigation and reinstatement process to be allowed to edit again and, of course, haven't done any such thing again]. I still would very much support keeping the articles merged, and there wasn't any dissent from anybody whatsoever when the merge was being discussed. However, considering the facts as they are, if there is any wish to create a new discussion, I would understand. Looking forward to hearing y'all's thoughts! - Navarre0107 (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]