Jump to content

Talk:Naval Air Station Patuxent River

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unsourced Trivia

[edit]

It was used as a filming location for the Harrison Ford movie Random Hearts (1999). Ford and director Sydney Pollack both visited Naval Air Station Patuxent River. Ford, a certificated pilot, flew in himself.‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› [citation needed]

No citation. Toddstreat1 22:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd double check periodically. It might eventually show up. 2602:306:BDA0:97A0:466D:57FF:FE90:AC45 (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis-farms

[edit]

The last update added tenant- and share-croppers (no source given). Offhand, I'd expect that type of mix to be less prevalent in a relatively small area such as being discussed. Also, the sentence refers to (implying they're names of farms) Mattapony, Susquehanna which are names for places elsewhere in Maryland. Tedickey (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All of this description comes straight out of the Pax River history cited in the references by the Pax River offices. I know - I entered it. Mark Sublette (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
well, then rather than simply remove the tag for this discussion, it would be nice if you provided a footnote indicating where in the (unavailable?) reference which you've cited the information appears. By the way, google finds the title dated 1999 by Linda Drew, not "circa 2000", however the reader cannot verify that this is the same reference that you used. Tedickey (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to footnote the pages when I turn up the brochure again - I picked up at the Air Station. The date and author were based on my best estimation as neither was printed in the document - I surmised the printing date based on the programs mentioned and the aircraft depicted. Right now I am a tad preocuupied - a pipe burst and put 3 feet of water in my basement... Mark Sublette (talk) 17:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette (talk) 17:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
thanks Tedickey (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Base railroad

[edit]

According to the story 'Brake Shoes Aweigh' by E. John Long from the March 1953 issue of Trains & Trave; (Pages 24-26), the railroad was diesel powered by 1952 and employed two Baldwin road locomotives and a 3rd Whitcomb yard locomotive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.1.161 (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naval Air Station Patuxent River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Naval Air Station Patuxent River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Balance needed

[edit]

This page seemed a bit one sided like most pages about military installations, seemed to ooze all military glory. I added a section of env contamination, since this is a heavily contaminated area, a superfund and there appears no end to remedies in the near future- 90 years after it all began... Wuerzele (talk) 17:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

?? I see no major balance issues. The article "History" section discusses how the original county residents were forced to give up land that had been in their families for generations, how crabbing and fishing communities were wiped out as well as farms, and how everyone was poorly compensated when the base was established.
That has been in the article for years. There is no glory-seeking in the article that I can see. It just states the facts about the base history. This is where planes were tested and developed for 70 years (and still are) those are facts, not glory-grabs.
Base chemical contamination is a legitimate subject for the article and should be included. The PFAS/PFOS contamination is not just at Webster field -- Naval Air Station Patuxent River itself also has documented PFAS contamination problems.
Chesapeake77 >>> Truth 09:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also Webster Field is 11 miles from the base and is in reality a separate facility, although "technically" it is under the command of PAX River.
Chesapeake77 >>> Truth 09:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

This source does not list all PAX Naval Air Base associated air crashes. For example, I was living south of the base when a fighter jet went down in a wooded area within a few miles of me in the summer of 1981 or 1982. The pilot was reported to have sacrificed himself in order to avoid crashing into residential homes. This crash is not listed in the linked source.

Also, the source lists crashes of planes that were bound for PAX River. However in 1966 I, along with my father, witnessed a midair collision between two fighter jets that were headed to PAX River NAS. This double crash is not listed in the source either.

If anyone has time at some point, perhaps these crashes (and others not listed in the linked source) can be found elsewhere online.

Chesapeake77 >>> Truth 11:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]