Talk:Naval Air Command Sub Aqua Club

Update of 7 February 2013

The following changes were made under the heading “External links” - add 'dead link' templates & remove link to bsac.com due to lack of relevance. A new home page does exist for NACSAC at the following, however this uses a domain banned by Wikipedia - http://www (DOT) qwiki (DOT) com/q/Naval_Air_Command_Sub_Aqua_Club. Cowdy001 (talk) 10:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Naval Air Command Sub Aqua Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Naval Air Command Sub Aqua Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120523181015/http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/navy-life/sports-and-adventure-training/crest-image to http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/navy-life/sports-and-adventure-training/crest-image

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Language

I was editing this page and found that most of the article is in American english and this is article mainly about an english club. Should we change the language? Someone0317 (talk) 01:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Someone0317 in reply to your question on my talkpage, MOS:RETAIN is the relevant bit of the Manual of Style here. So you did the right thing by starting a discussion to establish consensus. Can I check what in the article is in American English? On a quick skim all I notice is "organize", but that could be Oxford spelling. Mujinga (talk) 10:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is right. But should Oxford spelling be used in this article?

Thanks Someone0317 (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting confused here. "Organize" is British English under the Oxford variant, so I'm not sure what is the American English? Somebody written or added to the article using Oxford spelling and per MOS:CONSISTENT it would be good to keep it that way without a reason to change it. Wikipedia style makes no judgement about what language choice is better. I suppose best practice would have been for someone to have added Template:Use Oxford spelling to the article earlier on, just to make it clear. Mujinga (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]