Talk:Nautical tourism
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gquenville01.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Cleanup
[edit]This orphaned article has been tagged for cleanup for almost 2 years. It's not much of a stub, is an orphan, contains no significant information, sourcing or anythign of detail. I'm seriously considering putting it up for deletion. --Lendorien (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC) I agree with deletion, the article does not show significant promise for improvement.121.220.222.139 (talk) 10:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
KEEP - I give it a mediocre keep. Let me work on it some. I'll see if I can flesh it out. Doctorfun (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep and improve. I am very interested in this article. Saltysailor (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 | The contents of the Water tourism page were merged into Nautical tourism. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
"Water tourism" versus "nautical tourism" as the title for the article
[edit]Not that it's definitive, but Google results are 282,000 for "water tourism" versus 166,000 for "nautical tourism". -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)