Talk:Nauru at the 2012 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 04:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Always capitalize Games when referring to the Olympics. From: Dowabobo was eliminated by his opponent Navruz Jurakobilov in the round of 64 with Detemano finishing 14th in his event. To: Dowabobo was eliminated by his opponent Navruz Jurakobilov in the round of 64 and Detemano finished 14th in his event. This location of this sentence is a bit jarring, perhaps there is a logical break in talking about the country's participation at the Games and the individual's participation at the Games where you could split the paragraph? - Naura participated in the London Summer Games from 27 July to 12 August 2012. Typo: athleltes Improve this sentence: Along with the two athleltes, the delegation consisted of their coaches Paul Coffa and Patrick Mahon and Dowabobo trained at the University of Bath. Change phrase to phase Typo: opponment
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Debold the name of the article. Wikilink London
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	The highest number they sent was three, twice, in '96 and '04.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

@Kees08: I have addressed all of the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 08:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]