Talk:Natural (group)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Natural (group) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on December 31, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Weasel words

I deleted the following:

"It obviously did not fit in with the album's boy band pop being much better written and having a more mature vibe. It was a big fan favorite according to most."

Rumors were rife with why the band was splitting ~~but most believe it was very much Lou Pearlman's fault.~~

These are the most obvious weasel words, "most believe", "according to most". Please see WP:AWW. Please provide verifiable sources. Travb (talk) 03:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted myspace links

I deleted the following:

* [http://myspace.com/wellwornzeromusic Myspace page of ''Well Worn Zero''] (The 2nd defunct incarnation of Natural site) * [http://www.myspace.com/joshuamichaelhorn Unofficial Michael 'J' Horn Myspace Fan Site]

These sites are no name blogs. I know this violates policy, but I don't remember which one. Travb (talk) 00:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean 'no name blogs?' Both are sites for the guys mentioned in the article. Until you can cite a policy saying you cant link to a site about the people in an article please dont delete them... The Ginger One

The site you're looking for is WP:RS#Using_online_and_self-published_sources. It's against Wikipedia policy as myspace pages are not a reliable source. While it may be close to the band and hence be reasonably accurate, the problem is that it might be TOO close to the band and hence not be independent. Usual reliable sources are newspapers, academic journal articles and the rest (and if you think journal articles wouldn't exist on a boyband, some sociological researchers actually do study this stuff as a cultural phenomenon). Orderinchaos78 02:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Justonelastdance.jpg

Image:Justonelastdance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Naturalalbumcover.jpg

Image:Naturalalbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

This article should be cleaned up. Its certainly not neutral, especially in the section about the band splitting. There are more occurences.

Furthermore, this article should cite some sources. For example, the manager, cite some sources if he really had such rules as pointed out, or if they really had to lip sync on every show etc. MihaS (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Natural (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

problematic article

too much lengthy, long-uncited content.

I'm going to trim this down to reliable sources. please source correctly before re adding notable content.

thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 03:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]