Talk:Nativitas et victoria Alexandri Magni regis

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting articles

Classical Greece and Rome

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for adding the one new reference with details of the manuscript, but I think that it's best discussed on the Alexander Romance page for context and overlap.

Klbrain (talk) 19:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: Alexander Romance is far too broad to discuss individual versions in detail. If anywhere, this should have been merged to Leo of Naples. —Srnec (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yet half the content was already there. Leo of Naples would be a fine destination too. Klbrain (talk) 20:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: I disagree with the merge. Especially now that Ive added more material to the Nativitas entry on the Alexander Romance page (and more must still be added), it is too long to be on Alexander Romance which is not the place for extended discussion of Romance recensions. Pogenplain (talk) 06:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]