Talk:National symbols of Belarus

National symbols of Belarus was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 20, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
October 27, 2007	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
February 12, 2021	Good article reassessment	Delisted
September 1, 2021	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
Current status: Delisted good article

Belarus High‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Heraldry and vexillology

National symbols of Belarus is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

National flag

Absolutely wrong information. Flag in this section is OFFICIAL(just old Soviet Union variant), but this does not and can not guarantee that it became national. National flag of Belarus has longer history than particular soviet republic. This soviet flag is closely related to independence loss. At the moment of this flag creation Belarus was not free country (bolsheviks/russian communists/ aggression against BPR ). To claim this is the same as to say that russian national flag is the flag of Soviet Union and national flag of Germany should contain swastika. Nonsense.

In section "Unofficial symbols" currently exactly NATIONAL flag is present.

Returned sense to the article - corrected official and national.

Lisouczyk1 (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I laughed a lot about flora and fauna information. Thanks for a joke. Lisouczyk1 (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Until the law changes, the current official and national flag was the symbols adopted in 1995. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 18:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of low should change in case of dictatorship? There's no low , no elections. Don't you see difference between national and official symbols ? Your last update perverted the sense of the article and put absolutely wrong information. I cannot agree with you and accept that one of the oldest ethnos of Europe has history and national symbols started at 1951 ! I'm waiting for a distinct clarification of your personal POV, if not present undo will be applied.Lisouczyk1 ^{(Return Fire)} 08:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, a 1995 vote was passed (I know it is disputed) that changed the symbols of Belarus. Until a new law is passed to restore the 1991 flag and coat of arms, the current symbols of Belarus will be considered the national flag. I am not sure if English is your native language or not, but in English, the official flag is called the national flag and so on. The 1991 flag is important to Belarusians because not only it was a historic flag, but those who oppose Lukashenko use that flag. However, it is not a legally established symbol since 1995 in Belarusian law and we have to note it here. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 13:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon. It changed official symbols of Belarus, but not national. Nation lives longer than changing powers, especially foreign origin. If , for example , dutch flag was changed at the time of nazi occupation, what would we tell? Dutch national symbol changed, or dutch official symbol changed because occupation administration uses them? Would you poke something with swastiks to dutch people telling them "this is your national symbol"? Do you doubt that "vote" would pass? English is not my native language, but I start to doubt that's your too. Just tell me what would dutch guys do with you after that? At least I know what is national and historic belorussian flag. I'm sure that terms "official" and "national/historic" are more accurate than for example "unofficial" Lisouczyk1 (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally. What "law" are you talking about? 1) Less than half of voters accepted change. 2) Changing symbols broke constitution on which Lukashenko swore to protect it. 3) Isn't constitution highest law of the country? Lisouczyk1 (talk) 16:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 1991 symbols are now under the former symbols header, the unofficial symbols are just the flower and bison. The only reason why those are unofficial is because they are not defined in any Belarusian legislation that I could find. Constitutionally, the only symbols that are defined as "national" is the flag, arms and anthem. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 15:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks a bit more correct. But still cannot make from Lukashenko's coat-of-arm the national symbol. Dutch guys would beat you :) Lisouczyk1 (talk) 16:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm lost :( User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 16:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's use "official" and "historic" terms instead of "national" and "former". Lisouczyk1 (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to use historic, not sure about official. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 16:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to imagine something more official than that. Isn't it used on official level for ceremonial purposes? Lisouczyk1 (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The current flag is used as a national flag; used for official purposes at home and abroad and also used to represent Belarus (with the exceptions we noted of the groups who continue to use the 1991 flag). User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 16:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This flag could be even created by pinguins in Antarctica and officially used in Belarus for representing anything, but will never become national for belorussian people. You are steadily moving to personal POV. Lisouczyk1 (talk) 11:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I checked the official translations of the Belarusian Constitution, they do use "national" when talking about the symbols in Article 19. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 16:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution was re-written by Lukashenko. As result these symbols are symbols of Lukashenko and they cannot be "national" or "historic". They only officialy are representing current regime. It would be wise to plase section "Repressions for national symbols" in Belarus. Additionally there's such a small problem - absence of election. Please explain me how this simbol can be "national" for belarussian people if it was created in Moscow in 1951?Lisouczyk1 (talk) 11:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, your information clashes with other wiki pages on different languages, where it is clearly stated for Pahonia "traditional national coat-of-arms of Belarus". Lisouczyk1 (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not worried about the other wikiprojects. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 17:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately for you I do worry about this one. Lisouczyk1 (talk) 17:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on National symbols of Belarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:National symbols of Belarus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I am fulfilling a request to open this reassessment. Unfortunately, I notice that not all the content has a verifiable, reliable source. In addition, the article has little information (esp. third party sourced) for context. I find more info about Belarusian symbols in reliable books (such as [1][2][3]) which would ideally be included for third party commentary. (t · c) buidhe 05:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: This article was nominated back in 2007. It has unreliable sources, completely unsourced paragraphs, and very short sections. This is a start-class article at best. Wretchskull (talk) 16:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]