Talk:National Writers Union

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source

A couple of questions. The assertion that "most members" like the intercine warfare that has dominated the NWU's elections, what's your source?

And why no mention of the collapse of the union's membership after Tasini's departure?

I mean, really. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.19.163 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 29 June 2007

Source? Personal observation. What's your source, O Anonymous One, for the post hoc attribution of the diminished numbers to the departure of Tasini? Most people I know think it's about the health insurance debacle. --Orange Mike 02:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC) (member since 1985)[reply]

I asked for the source about the "most members" thinking that the controversial elections were good for the union, and the best you can offer is personal observation. Now, I could just as easily say that from my experience, that "most members" did not think the unending controversy was good for the union. As it says at the bottom of the page, "Encyclopeic content must be verifiable." And your personal observation doesn't cut it. Moreover, the assertion that membership declined after Tasini's departure is verifiable. NWU membership was north of 7,000 when he was president. Now there is substantially less -- approx. 2,000. These numbers while not exact, are much more easily verified than your personal observation. The chronology is as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.19.163 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 29 June 2007

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Writers Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]