Talk:National War Memorial (South Australia)/GA1

GA Review

GA on hold

This article has some small issues that need reoslving before it can be passed. Firstly, a {{fact}} template has been placed where a reference is needed because of the use of a direct quote. Secondly, in the construction section, I do not understand the issue over inside and outside rates so this will need to be explained further.

This is otherwise an excellent article, well referenced with good use of images. I have made a few minor changes that mainly involved removing references to authors of books outside of the reception section as it gave the article a slightly essay-like feel rather than encyclopedic. This article will be watched for seven days and if no improvement is made by then may be failed. Good luck! Million_Moments (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that! The article is definitely looking better - but I'm a tad embarrassed that I missed a direct quote. :) I've fixed the quote and (hopefully) clarified the inside and outside rates of pay. (I should have known better, given that it took me a while to figure it out when I first read it). - Bilby (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Pass

Congratulations, this article has now passed! The article is very good and there are not many ways I can recomend improving it except to expand it as much as possible. Though possibly impossible to get hold it, you could look for newspaper coverage from the time to be able to expand the reception section. Congratulations again, and keep up the good work! Million_Moments (talk) 10:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll see what I can do with the reception section - I've been looking, but most of the old newspaper reports I've got hold of so far just said that it existed, and the exceptions were in a collection where they hadn't kept any of the publication details, so I can't use them. :( But I shall keep looking. :) - Bilby (talk) 00:05, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]