Talk:National Testing Service
This article was nominated for deletion on January 10, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article is about a non-profit NGO. It is not intended for any kind of business. Just an informative article about an organization similar to ETS of USA.
I request, that this page may not be deleted. It may be edited to conform to wikipedia's standards, or i may be informed of what changes i can make.
Sabre centaur (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nobody has suggested that it is commercial. It simply doesn't meet the notability criteria. Mayalld (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
It is an extremely notable organization of Pakistan, no one can get admission to any good university or college without clearing its test. It may not be notable internationally, but it definitely is at a local scale.Sabre centaur (talk) 15:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I request that this may not be deleted, but i may be notified of what changes i can make. Sabre centaur (talk) 15:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I have declined the speedy, because I do not feel that a speedy of this sort would be uncontroversial. I'd like to suggest that you can substantiate the notability of this by including references to uninvolved sources. Information from the organization's website can be used to add detail to the article, but not to substantiate notability. Thanks for your contribution. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :) Sabre centaur (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
This article has again been marked for deletion. I will try adding more info Sabre centaur (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I really cannot find any verfication of the organization from anywhere except its own website!! I know I have to present verifiable sources. I will try doing that in a day or two. If not this article may be deleted. Rules are rules ! Sabre centaur (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you can't find any sources, then that it pretty strong evidence that it isn't notable. However, as an AfD, you have a few days to fix it. Mayalld (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Remember, too, that you can add sources from other languages. They do not need to exist in English, although English sources are helpful in the English language Wikipedia. I have added one source, and I will see if I can find more. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:National Testing Service/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The information in this article is not very well arranged and comprehensive. |
Last edited at 18:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 00:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Testing Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105215406/http://www.moe.gov.pk/mediacell.htm to http://www.moe.gov.pk/mediacell.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)