Talk:National Route 7 (Argentina)

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Latin American Highways Task Force.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Argentina High‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine Geography. If you would like to participate, you can improve National Route 7 (Argentina), or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Quality issues

I've demoted this back to start class because length of an article doesn't equate to quality.

The Cities section should be removed and replaced with a written (prose) account of the route of that the highway follows. That should then be sourced to reliable maps, guide books and other sources. This is generally titled "Route description" for a heading name.
The Services section needs to be recrafted because Wikipedia is not a tour guide. The locations of the toll booths can be included in the junction list table. (See MOS:RJL.)
A lot of the information of the Road conditions section should be in a proper Route description section.
Details from the Management section should be either in the RD section, or the History. For an example, the agency or agencies that maintain a road are listed with other meta details in the RD of U.S. Route 131. Historical changes related to those facts are typically part of the history section.
The Transit section isn't needed.
- Speed limits, which as statistics need sources, can be listed in the RD section.
- Ditto the traffic counts, which doesn't need a full explanation on how the numbers are calculated. We have the annual average daily traffic article to explain in greater detail. Sources are needed for the specific numbers listed. Look at the US 131 article linked above to see how I wove the traffic counts into the RD section, or M-14 (Michigan highway) for a method that lists them in a meta paragraph at the end of that section.
All of the geography stuff should be in the RD section. Again, describe the route of the roadway from one end to the other. Note what a hypothetical driver would see and experience if he went from end to end, all backed to reliable sources.
Tourism information also belongs in the RD section, but be careful. We aren't a tour guide here, but an encyclopedia. Imzadi 1979 → 20:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on National Route 7 (Argentina). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]