This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
As i just noted at Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Stamford, Connecticut for that list-article, i notice here also that an editor has added neighborhood/section identifications in a column, but with no source given for the column's information as a whole or for individual items. Having seen the consequences of permitting unsourced, personal knowledge-type info in other cases, and having learned from the experience with another CT city that neighborhood definitions can be surprisingly contentious, I am of the opinion that unsourced information should not be allowed, should be rooted out upfront. Can sourcing be added promptly? If not, I expect to delete the info given. One approach to creating info about neighborhoods and getting that validated would be to start and develop a List of Greenwich, Connecticut neighborhoods. In the absence of clear definitions and sources, the info should be deleted from here though. --doncram (talk) 06:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm noticing further edits to add mention of places being "in northern Greenwich" or elsewhere, which seem to be unnecessary verbiage. Sources or not, those should usually be removed. I removed some, see Polaron adding some back. I grant that a link to a neighborhood name, for a place named Neighborhood Station, could be useful. For the others, excessive location info on top of addresses and coordinates is not helpful. --doncram (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
^Numbers represent an alphabetical ordering by significant words. Various colorings, defined here, differentiate National Historic Landmarks and historic districts from other NRHP buildings, structures, sites or objects.
^The eight-digit number below each date is the number assigned to each location in the National Register Information System database, which can be viewed by clicking the number.
