Talk:National Pigeon Service

D-Day carrier pigeon cipher was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 December 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into National Pigeon Service. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Military history: British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

If more detail is found on the chimney-pigeon could detail be added to [1] please. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pigeon NURP 40 TW 194 - alternative spelling

It might be the case, that the widely presented ciphertext transcipt

AOAKN HVPKD FNFJW YIDDC RQXSR DJHFP GOVFN MIAPX PABUZ WYYNP CMPNW HJRZH NLXKG MEMKK ONOIB AKEEQ WAOTA RBQRH DJOFM TPZEH LKXGH RGGHT JRZCQ FNKTQ KLDTS FQIRW AOAKN

is incorrect and the correct one is rather

AOAKN HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC RQXSR DJHFP GOVFN MIAPX PABUZ WYYNP CMPNW HJRZH NLXKG MEMKK ONOIB AKEEQ UAOTA RBQRH DJOFM TPZEH LKXGH RGGHT JRZCQ FNKTQ KLDTS GQIRU AOAKN

Please use your own eyes, judgement, and the message scan.
Mykhal (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The scanned paper is no longer available at that weblink -- I'll try and find another one in high-enough resolution.Mfhulskemper (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image appears to be archived at http://archive.is/F1rJA. --Mykhal (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

'As of December 2012...' Should this be updated? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Is [2] a suitable link? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National Pigeon Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080922204813/http://www.pdsa.org.uk:80/page309_3.html to http://www.pdsa.org.uk/page309_3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

...for the claims/statements of Gord Young and Michael Smith would be useful in the context. Jackiespeel (talk) 09:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]