Talk:National Navy of Uruguay

Military history: Maritime / National / South America C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	National militaries task force
	South American military history task force

Uruguay High‑importance

	Uruguay portal This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Uruguayan military forces. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

ROU Marking

For discussion of translation ROU, see Talk:Uruguay#Formal_name. -LlywelynII (talk) 10:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished

Still needs bits ironed out. For history and current command structure, see the official Armada Nacional site. -LlywelynII (talk) 10:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History section ran a bit long. Possibly its own section? More information about historic ships here and here and the current fleet here. Apparently, the new frigates note only ran into one another in South Africa, but the Uruguay was rammed by a fishing boat in port at Montevideo as well. Poor guys. Luckily both are only placeholders while the Navy waits and hopes for more recent German Bremen-class ships. Need more authoritative sources, but they'd prolly be in Spanish. -LlywelynII (talk) 15:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Icons & Photographs

Each branch has its own coat of arms and the page would look better with these added in as thumbnails (eg, before each item in the list of branches at the top of the page). Similarly, there are pages of photographs for most of the ships that would be improvements over some of the Spanish wiki photos currently used.

However, I don't know what the status is on copyright for images from Uruguayan government sites. Anyone know? -LlywelynII (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on National Navy of Uruguay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]