Talk:National Information Infrastructure
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The article has no inline references, but I read the references in the list and they don't support political analysis in this article. I think if you're going to produce analysis like this on Wikipedia, you really need an inline citation. I removed: "A side effect of the Clinton Administration programs to build the NII was a push by cultural industries to expand the scope of copyright. This led to the creation of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. It was also used by the patent industry in order to widen the scope of patentability." --50.88.182.74 (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Oops, wasn't logged in. --joeOnSunset (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. Also need to tie together the similar buzzword generator (and lobbyist employer) from the next administration of that party: National Broadband Plan (United States) of 2009-2010. W Nowicki (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles
- Low-importance Computer networking articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- All Computing articles