Jump to content

Talk:National Coordination Committee Against Corruption and Crime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
Created by Vinegarymass911 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Mehedi Abedin 03:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Interesting article. All parts of the article are cited with no problems with copyright. The stated hook is also mentioned in the article with proper sourcing. Good to go. Toadboy123 (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]
    • Reverting promotion to prep; the hook is 223 prose characters including its "equivalent" parenthetical, way too far about the 200-character maximum. Vinegarymass911, please propose a shorter hook. The current hook's "from corruption suspects which the court deemed was illegal" has confusing antecedents; it's not the suspects that were illegal, but presumably how they acquired the funds. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT: ... that ৳6.5 billion (equivalent to US$150 million in 2023) was collected from corruption suspects by a Bangladeshi government agency which the court deemed was illegal in 2017?
@AirshipJungleman29: Done. Mehedi Abedin 13:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Toadboy123: As the original reviewer, can you confirm that this article now meets the DYK requirements, and indicate it below? If it does not meet the requirements, can you please outline what else needs to be done? Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: All issues recitified and article looks good now. GTG. Toadboy123 (talk) 11:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron: You are right. A article should contain source from multiple newspaper. The government agency established in 2007 and dissolved in 2008. In that time, very few newspapers had websites and even if they had websites and published news, maybe these news article links are now dead and it is normal in Bangladesh. But still we have newspaper archives from we can find news about it but we have to go to the specific date for the news on other newspapers. For example, in article these is a source from the Daily Star : Taskforces handed enormous power. It was published on 9 March 2007. The same news I got from Prothom Alo and Janakantha. Here is the link for the PDF of that date - Janakantha 9 March 2007 (Wikipedia doesn’t let me put Google drive link so I am giving link from you can find all newspaper from March 2007). I found the news in this archive newspaper. As it was written in Bengali, English native speakers will not able to read it. But you can take help from other Bengali people. Another source we can see in the article It was illegal which was published on 17 March 2017. Another Bengali-language source states the same news: ব্যবসায়ীদের ৬১৫ কোটি টাকা ফেরত দেওয়ার পূর্ণাঙ্গ রায় প্রকাশ. Please note that it is time consuming to find alternative for every sources we have on the article. But still it doesn’t lose notability because it is an government agency which was one of important topics during 2006–2008 Bangladeshi political crisis. It is logical to assume that like I got two alternative sources other than the Daily Star, it is possible to find alternative for all source we have for the article. So, to me, there is no issue about its notability. Mehedi Abedin 18:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: If you do not think that this article meets GNG, please nominate it for AfD so that this doesn't languish at DYK unaddressed. Z1720 (talk) 20:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mm. Seems like GNG's met, so I'll repromote. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:National_Coordination_Committee_Against_Corruption_and_Crime&oldid=1239188538"