Talk:National Christian Network

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as No Merge - No rationale given by adder of merge tags, only comment was oppose, nothing else after a month. - BilCat (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Azumanga1 puts forward that National Christian network should be merged with FamilyNet. I am not so certain that that's the case.

Are the details of the history of the network, for instance, relevant to FamilyNet, a currently operating network? Yes, as a foundation for the history of the network and it's ownership, but No regarding goals in programming and purpose. The channel has had four owners, who possibly had very different goals for the network. What We've got here is the basics, the background. But a lot of it is clutter when you are trying to talk about a real network, one that is operational today. Not that the information doesn't belong on Wikipedia, just that it doesn't belong in the FamilyNet article.

I suspect that there's probably a lot more that can be written about National Christian Network, the Liberty Broadcasting Network, Jerry Falwell's FamilyNet, and the Southern Baptist version of the same, It's just not a line of research that I've been able to tackle. Actually, the references that are listed came from researching two other articles, American Christian Television System and Vision Interfaith Satellite Network. Previously, Wikipedia had treated them as if they were almost the same network [1], which they weren't. Let's not make the same mistakes here. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 02:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Christian Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615032336/http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=26713 to http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=26713

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]