Talk:National Center for Supercomputing Applications

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

TracyNCSA (talk · contribs) / National Center for Supercomputing Applications This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here)

LIGO

While it's true that the timeline at NCSA says in 1992 "Black hole simulations support development of LIGO" (emphasis added by me), the official site makes it clear that LIGO was developed by CalTech and MIT, so I'm going to edit it to say "supporting". -Jacob 68.161.230.208 02:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repetition

This article needs cleanup... a lot, there is repetition and everything. I removed a part because it was repetitive. -- rburp

Is there a caption for the photo?

KarenAnn 16:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Link

The links to Thom Dunning seem to be bad. One link references a Wikipedia entry that doesn't exsist, the other is lacking a valid domain.

Another bad link?

When I tried to follow (click on) the link to "Larry Smarr's testimony before US House of Representatives", it took [forwarded?] me to a page at "http://science.house.gov/" with no explanation of what the problem [if any] was. Mike Schwartz 00:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ncsa logo sm.gif

Image:Ncsa logo sm.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modified History Section

Changed and improved the opening "History" paragraph. Actually, it should be rewritten to focus on the research (which is the reason NCSA exists), with less focus on the software that was released, although that seems to be what captured public attention. The other history sections also could stand modification, should someone with the knowledge also develop the inclination. 24.178.228.14 (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The section about the creation of the NSF centers expands on a brief mention in the History section; I think it should be folded into History. Malkmus07 (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Modified Business Partners Section

Added information about the program; formatted list into columns for a better reader experience. The link to Smarr's congressional testimony did not go there, and so was removed. 24.178.228.14 (talk) 22:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Director?

According to the website, Dr. William "Bill" Gropp is NCSA Director and Chief Scientist. I assume that replaces Ed Seidel? 207.229.172.191 (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]