Talk:National Bureau of Investigation (Philippines)/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about National Bureau of Investigation (Philippines). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Alleged High Levels of Corruption
I removed a paragraph that read "one of the most corrupt agencies in the Philippines" or something to that effect, for two reasons: 1) it was a loaded statement, not in keeping with what would be appropriate for encyclopedic content; and 2) it was not supported by any data.
Perhaps the person who wrote that paragraph might find statistical data to support his statement that the NBI is perceived to be one of the most corrupt agencies in the Philippines? Or if there are accurate measures of actual corrupt practices, that would be much better data. At the moment, I have no idea how to acquire that data myself, unfortunately.
If Filipinos want to improve the way things are done in the Philippines, we (I am proudly Pinoy!) must first learn to support our arguments properly. :-) Otherwise, none of us will ever reach an agreement and our body politic will never mature.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.217.64.112 (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC).
What are the facts finding concerning the weapons used against the 44 PNP SAF. Your prompt attention in this matter is highly appreciated. RIP 44SAF Lucasengine (talk) 17:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Organizational Structure
Er... I was hoping to find information here about the organizational structure and Standard Operational Procedures of the NBI? And also, the various agencies whose mandate might overlap with it? I need it for a screenplay I'm working on. :-) 124.217.64.112 16:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Nbilogo1.gif
Image:Nbilogo1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
No citations...
This article lacks it, not to mention that the history part is directly copied from it. If nothing is done, I'll soon remove it unless someone can fix it ASAP. Ominae (talk) 08:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)