Talk:National Army Museum

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Memorials / National / British / European / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force
	National militaries task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:National army museum logo.jpg

Image:National army museum logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:National army museum logo.jpg

Image:National army museum logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:National army museum logo.jpg

Image:National army museum logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Museum redevelopment and reopening

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

Hello fellow Wikipedians

Now that the museum has reopened after a lengthy redevelopment, some of the information in this article is out of date, especially the gallery information.

I'm happy to point you in the direction of information and sources, but due to COI issues I'm unable to directly edit myself.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks - NAM17 (talk) 16:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to post the key proposed additions here with independent citations. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on what Dormskirk said, edit requests are intended to work as thus: editors with a conflict of interest can propose specific edits/sentences, which are then reviewed by unbiased Wikipedia editors for neutrality, sufficient citations to reliable sources, copyright and close paraphrasing checks, and compliance with other policies. The onus is on the edit requestor to provide a workable draft. Since the edit request queue has a backlog of over 0 entries, requests that provide specific changes or additions will receive priority over general requests for updates. As you have not provided any specific sentences you wish to have added to the article, I am afraid there's not much I can currently do to help you. Altamel (talk) 02:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction section changes

I propose that the introduction is updated to reflect the redevelopment and reopening of the museum. Perhaps under for the second paragraph it could read as follows:

"Having reopened in March 2017 following a major £ 23.75 million re-development project including £ 11.5m from the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF), it houses five dynamic galleries that explore the bridge between the British Army and society from the English Civil War up to modern day. Designed with architects BDP and exhibition design agency Event, the bright new Museum maximises access and engagement with the Collection, providing a 21st century visitor experience."

Sources can be found here:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/attention-forward-march-to-a-light-filled-museum-of-army-life-6mkzvk3bg

http://www.kcwtoday.co.uk/2017/03/national-army-museum-re-opens-three-years/

http://building-projects.co.uk/news/national-army-museum-refreshed-by-bdp/

NAM17 (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, although I have toned it down a bit to remove the advertising. Dormskirk (talk) 16:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. NAM17 (talk) 09:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery section text updates

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hi. Now that the gallery information is out of date, I've supplied the following text so the page can be updated. I'm not sure if the old gallery text is worth keeping or not.

Solider gallery

An insight into life as a serving soldier. The Soldier gallery recalls personal experiences from joining up to coming home through inspiring objects that explore the physical and emotional experience of soldiering throughout the army’s history.

The gallery follows the life of a soldier from joining the army to training and daily life, and the reality of crime and punishment, to exploring both combat and non-combat roles. Visitors can engage with a series of tests to find out if they could become a soldier and can be drilled in marching. Objects on display within the gallery include Crimean Tom, a cat found during the Crimean War and brought back to Britain as a pet; the Welsh flag which formed part of the memorial of a soldier who was wounded in Afghanistan in 2009 and later died in hospital; and James McGuire’s Victoria Cross, which he received for gallantry during the Indian Mutiny but lost when he was convicted of stealing his uncle’s cow!

Army gallery

The Army gallery charts the army as an institution. Exploring the army’s origins in the chaos of the British Civil Wars and examining its role in the political development of the country and its impact on global history, the gallery also analyses the army’s relevance through technological and social change.

Visitors can explore how the army has adapted and evolved in the face of political and popular policy, changing circumstance and innovation to remain effective and achieve its objectives. The international story of the British Army is told through paintings including portraits of Oliver Cromwell and Khudadad Khan VC (the first Indian Solder to win the Victoria Cross) as well as the first official representation of black soldiers in the army on the Regimental Colour of the West Indian Regiment.

Battle gallery

Explore what battle really feels like. From the 17th century to the present day, victory to defeat, the Battle gallery shows the British Army fulfilling its most challenging task - conflict - through multimedia interpretations, interactives, visual and sensory experiences.

Visitors can experience some of these technological developments through interactives such as driving a tank or drumming a battle command. The Battle of Waterloo is brought to life with a new multimedia interpretation of the Siborne Model that enables visitors to investigate both the model and the famous battle.

Society gallery

Looking at the army’s impact on today’s customs, values and choices. The Society gallery examines the army’s influence on the world we live in today from music (Jimi Hendrix by Gered Mankowitz) to medicine, toys (Action Man) to technology through to fashion and food. It examines moments when the army has been loved and loathed, as well as the differing roles of the British soldier ranging from aggressor, support for natural disasters as well as protector of our national security.

Looking at the army in fashion (Burberry Trench Coat), fiction (War Horse) and journalism (Kate Adie’s Flak Jacket, helmet, identity discs and press pass), and at its impact on medicine, technology and benevolence, the army is revealed as recognisable and distant, loved and loathed. The gallery also examines moments when communities have encountered British soldiers in circumstances of conflict, natural disaster and national security.

Insight gallery

Examining the impact of the British Army globally. With no other army having seen service in as many countries, the Insight gallery examines the impact of the British Army on a world stage, its interaction with different cultures and its influence on these cultures and theirs on the army.

Intended as a regularly changing exhibition, the gallery’s opening displays look at the army’s connection with Germany, Scotland, the Punjab, Ghana and Sudan. Communities from these areas have been involved in the creation of the gallery, sharing thoughts on their relationship with Britain, the army and the objects within the Museum’s collection, such as a Nazi Car Pennant and a Chakra, or Fortress, Turban.

Sources

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/what-to-see/national-army-museums-reinvention-thought-provoking-triumph/

https://www.nam.ac.uk/press/national-army-museum-open-question

http://advisor.museumsandheritage.com/features/national-army-museum-reopens-following-three-year-23m-development/

http://londonist.com/london/museums-and-galleries/a-first-look-at-the-new-national-army-museum

Feel free to edit for NPOV reasons

Hi - Most of this is just copied from https://www.nam.ac.uk/press/national-army-museum-open-question which cannot be used for two reasons (i) breach of copyright and (ii) we need the material independently sourced. But I have removed the old out of date material. Dormskirk (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change of Image

Hi

I've uploaded a new image of the exterior of the building, so that the image of the old museum can be updated for a new one.

Exterior shot of the National Army Museum, from the Royal Hospital Road, June 2017

Thanks NAM17 (talk) 09:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

done. Dormskirk (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Website URL Change

Hi. The old website address is still on display and needs changing. The new one is: https://www.nam.ac.uk/

Thanks

done. Dormskirk (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo removal

Hi. The logo on the page is out of date. Could this be taken down?

Thanks NAM17 (talk) 10:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

done. Dormskirk (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dormskirk Thanks for all you help. NAM17 (talk) 13:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on National Army Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Army Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV re debates over museum presentation and staffing

I have reversed recent edits to restore NPOV. The passage I deleted ran: '[NAM director] Maciejewski has explicitly rolled back on decolonisation and other attempts in the 2017 redisplay to deal with controversial aspects of the army's history, despite concerns raised earlier in his tenure about the lack of ethnic diversity in the Museum's staff and a mishandled staff restructure.' Sources cited were: https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2021/05/concerns-raised-over-national-army-museum-restructure/ And: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/04/14/national-army-museum-resists-decolonisation-british-history/ Criticisms of the museum approach are certainly worth including, especially to counterbalance the Roberts commentary. But it is not objective to assert that the restructure was 'mishandled'; a more appropriate summary would attribute critiques in quotations to individual sources rather than editorialising. The Museums Association article also does not mention concerns over ethnic diversity, as the edit claimed; instead it alludes to gender diversity. Valid to include reporting on the NAM director's public comments regarding historical interpretation, but again it is not objective to simply assert that the the museum does not address controversial aspects of army history, particularly when the director has said otherwise (MA article: 'There is also a wide-ranging public programme that tackles difficult and complex chapters in the history of the army including controversial episodes such as the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the Amritsar Massacre in 1919 and the uprising of 1857 in India.') A better intervention would quote and summarise a range of POV to inform readers of the differing views; happy to participate in a discussion here about how to achieve this. RogerSheaffe (talk) 10:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]