Talk:Nathuram Premi

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Jainism Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Manual of Style – Naming conventionsJainismWikipedia:WikiProject JainismTemplate:WikiProject JainismJainism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rating of this Article without providing the reasons

Hi, Thanks for your contribution to Project Jainism. Please discuss on What basis you have rated the article as Start Class article. I believe that it should be rated atleast "GA" or "B" class and has a potential to be FA with some corrections. Your failure to respond will result in changing it to GA class. I am also copying it in talk pages of Jainism_and_non-creationism for records. Please discuss the same for Nathuram_Premi--Anish Shah 06:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate GA guidelines by saying that you would rate the article as a GA despite being a substantial contributor to it. The article is in my opinion on the Start-B border, and I chose the lower end rating due to the lack of citations and links to other articles. The presence of only 5 citations for the entire article is woefully insufficient. Many or most of the relevant internal links to other articles as missing, and should be included. Article has many POV problems, including unreferenced use of such terms as "beautiful", "classic", "excelled", "foremost", etc. Such terms should only be used when they are explicitly used in a neutral reliable source, and generally not even then, unless the source indicates that there is general agreement on such matters within the entire relevant community, which in this case would extend beyond the Indian or Jain community. There are at least a few grammatical problems which detract from the quality of the article. John Carter 14:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the reasoning of User:Warlordjohncarter is valid, but I would choose to err on the higher end and classify this as a B-class article. GA class articles normally go through an intensive nomination process. I would add non-Jain sources, reduce the use of adjectives like those given above, add more links, reduce grammatical errors, and add more different viewpoints. However, the presence of citations as well as the infobox and pictures would probably make this a B-class article. --Qmwne235 17:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Changing to B. John Carter 17:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also feel that B-class seems to be fair enough--Anish Shah 18:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]