Talk:Nathan Schneider

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nathan Schneider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A confession by the subject and initial author of this page

I created this page about myself, in violation of Wikipedia best practices. It was wrong, and I am sorry for it.

I did this at a time when I felt very strongly the pressures of self-promotion. I was working as a freelance reporter, and my livelihood depended on visibility and the appearance of credibility. I created the page anonymously and, when my first attempts were unsuccessful, I added to it and developed it until it was published. Occasionally, I have since edited it for accuracy.

In the years since, as I should have immediately, I have come to regret this transgression of the rules—the rules of a platform and community that I greatly respect. I now teach university students about the values of peer-production communities, and this has caused me to remember from time to time this case in which I violated those values.

The path to repentance is easier for me due to the fact that I am no longer so much subject to the rule of the attention economy. The ancient guild of the academy today encourages its share of precariousness and attention-mongering, but one thing it does is collectivize certain aspects of knowledge production. The solidarity among my colleagues has quelled my former anxiety to appear more respectable and visible than my work deserves; their example tugs me toward greater integrity. With them, I also share certain resources for online self-presentation, such as our college’s website and the university’s publicity services.

I have been reflecting on the pressures that tempted me to create this page—the economy of intellectual production that relies on precarious contract work, isolation, and self-promotion. I hope that we might build mechanisms that enable knowledge producers to experience solidarity more easily, such as unions and cooperatives and more secure employment in academia and journalism. These organizations might, for instance, build new platforms where members can introduce themselves to their audiences in a space that, like Wikipedia, is neutral, trustworthy, and non-profit. In the meantime, however, I hope the commons will accept my apology and do with this page what it would like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntnsndr (talk • contribs) 01:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ntnsndr: Thank you for this. It is extremely common for people to act as you did early on in this article. It is likewise extremely rare for someone to make a statement such as this. I appreciate your candor. In the future, if there's anything that you think needs to be changed on the article, let us know here on the talk page. Ping me if you like, using the {{ping}} template, and I will have a look. Thank you again, --Hammersoft (talk) 02:09, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]