Talk:Nathalia Kaur

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil: Arts Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Infobox image

I think File:05 Nathalia Department - Flickr - rgvzoomin.jpg is most professional and free image available. But it seems 3 users have 3 diff choices. this User:2222hancock talk about Nathalia Kaur herself. User:Sundostund has diff choice. So let's discuss and I request other users to comment. Abhi (talk) 13:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My choice is File:Nathalia Kaur and RGV promote Department film at Radio City FM (8).jpg. Among all her pictures uploaded on Commons, I like this pic more than any other. She looks great on it, and it is free image too. Of course, I let other users decide which image is the best for infobox. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 14:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, close-up images are preferred. I can crop that image. But I think File:05 Nathalia Department - Flickr - rgvzoomin.jpg is most professional image. Let other users comment. Let there be any image with consensus. Abhi (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On WP, it is generally preferred to have an image which clearly shows what a subject in question looks like, and my image satisfy that criteria. I truly like that image and, as I already said, I invite other users to say which image they want for infobox. No hard feelings, just a clear consensus. --Sundostund (talk) 15:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My image also satisfy 'criteria'. More and more people are using mobiles and full size images doesn't show face clearly on mobile. Anyway, I will crop 'your' image. Is that OK with you? Abhi (talk) 17:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No one said that your image doesn't satisfy criteria, the only issue here is which image is more appealing to users... Yes, you can crop my image, but don't left just her head, let it show more than just face. --Sundostund (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And, Abhi, although this is unrelated to this matter, can you please make a crop of King Birendra of Nepal out of this picture - File:King Birendra adorning a medal to Major General Nara Bahadur Burathoki.jpg? There's already a crop of Queen Aishwarya made out of that image - File:Queen Aishwarya of Nepal.jpg... --Sundostund (talk) 17:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, your Nathalia Kaur's image cropped and restored. That user:2222hankcock may come anytime to restore his image. Also I cropped and uploaded File:King Birendra of Nepal.jpg. If you want half size image, I can crop further. But original image is of low quality, hence quality will decrease further after crop. Abhi (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cropping Birendra, Abhi. I think its good as it is, and I'll post it to relevant articles. If its of low quality, and if further cropping would decrease its quality even more, there's no reason to crop it further... If you and me reached a consensus about pic, 2222hankcock must abide to that consensus. Btw, it seems someone reverted your cropping of Nathalia Kaur's pic. Maybe you should make a crop out of original image, instead of cropping the original itself? --Sundostund (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]