Talk:Natasha Wheat

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

[Untitled]

Hello,

After reviewing the deletion of the past article, it seems to have been deleted for a lack of notability under the WP:N, which makes sense. However this article, that I began contains references that post-date the deletion of the previous article from reliable secondary sources.

Hamnrye (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Hamnrye[reply]

Similarities with regard to the last AfD

Note that there has been little improved since the last unanimous deletion. The four points in the deleted article were:

1. She is an American artist
2. She exhibited at the Museum of National Art in 2010
3. She is the founder of Project Grow
4. There was an article on her in the Oregonian.

These are the same points being made in this "new" article. The only difference is the addition of one or two articles on Project Grow that briefly mention Wheat's involvement in the program - these are not articles on Wheat herself. It's the same puffery that lead to the last deletion. It has been recreated and deleted three times with no substantial improvement - it looks like it needs to go a fourth round now. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOT THE CASE. I included four references to articles and interviews with Wheat herself

1. Bad at Sports (http://badatsports.com/2010/episode-252-natasha-wheat/)
2. Art Practical, two articles (http://www.artpractical.com/feature/interview_with_natasha_wheat/) (http://www.artpractical.com/feature/serving_cooking_giving_it_away/)
3. the Examiner
4. Museum of Contemporary Art Website (http://www.mcachicago.org/exhibitions/exh_detail.php?id=251) was not on the previous deleted article, and had not happened yet. This article is not accountable for the failures of the previous article of a lack of notability at that time- all of these references are from post-deletion.

The only similarity to the previous article is the first sentence which I took from the PDX.edu website, (also post dating the previous deletion) where the artist gave a lecture (http://www.pdx.edu/events/artist-lecture-natasha-wheatproject-grow) I included Project Grow and the Oregonian article as they were the usable parts of the previous article, and added to this article, that does not qualify this as puffery. Hamnrye (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Hamnrye[reply]

Not Notable citations are not legitimate news articles, rather promotional. I don't believe this passes muster yet. Trickaphobe (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Non-admin closure. Wrong venue. If you want to discuss whether an article is notable or not, you should nominate it at WP:AFD Bosstopher (talk) 00:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

If this fine arts practitioner notable ? Info por favor (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The proper venue for this discussion is WP:AFD if at least one editor is convinced that the subject is not notable or at least of marginal enough notability that it warrants a serious deletion consideration.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Natasha Wheat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]