Talk:Natasha Henstridge

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).

Canada: Alberta Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

You Gotta Be Kidding

Whoever wrote this can't complete a grammatically correct sentence. Major rewrite.

photos

I enjoy her naked as much as the next man, but this is hardly the place to be trading vidcaps. - Tarquin Sidebottom

dont make any changes in my page

dont delete or make any change to my page ...if u have a problem with the images ,,better not watch it ....i found more objectionable images than mine in several articles.. IF U HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY IMAGES ,JUST IGNORE THEM....AJEET ROBINS

Ajeet, you don't own this page. You do own your contributions to the page, but the page is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, and you have granted a general license for your content to be used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows others, including other Wikipedia editors, to use and modify the content in any way they choose, as long at their changes are also under the GFDL. Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles for more information on this subject. Gentgeen 16:44, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. Whenever you're editing an article, check the bottom of the page, last sentence in bold. I quote: If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, do not submit it.. And further about the images: I see you have not provided a status description for them. If the images are under copyrights and we do not have the owner's permission to use them, they cannot be in the article, and will probably be deleted from our servers. For more on this, please see Wikipedia:Copyrights, Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ and Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Thanks, Redux 00:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summaries

I am not at all convinced that we should have the plot summaries on this page. They are more suited to wikipedia articles on the movies themselves rather than on this article about Henstridge. Comments? --Yamla 22:57, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

You are right. We could have small descriptions of Henstridge's role in each movie, but that would be best if really limited, with a wikilink to the appropriate article. Regards, Redux 04:01, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The level of description for Species is OK, but Species II is far more than we need here. If kept as is, it needs a spoiler tag, which I will add in the interim. Sunray 23:38, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

I've trimmed everything after the spoiler warning and moved it all to the Species II article - that was a stub anyway, so it makes sense for the text to go there. Bob the Pirate 11:51, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

message

PLEASE DONT TAMPER WITH MY ARTICLE ....its my article ... ......if u dont like my article PLEASE DONT READ IT .........what is so difficult to understand ? AJEET ROBINS

Ajeet, it isn't your article. See above for a complete explanation why you have already agreed this is the case. --Yamla 15:11, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Before anything else: if you have an account, why are you posting here under an IP address? There are changes in the article made by Ajeet robins, but all comments on this talk page made on behalf of that account have been made under an IP address. Please, don't do that. Log in, and sign your comments with tildes (~~~~), this way, we can account for your contributions and credit you for them. On the issue itself: this is been already explained above quite clearly. Please, read those posts, and the pages linked in them. If you feel you cannot agree to that, you have two options: don't submit material to Wikipedia or you can use your user page to speak Henstridge's glory, but note WP:NOT: a user page is not a personal website. As far as this article is concerned, however, sorry but you do not own it. Regards, Redux 18:42, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Title

"the quintessential sci-fi actress"? Why? Fang Aili 19:18, 22 August 2005 (UTC) It must be the chest. Resonanteye[reply]

Power and Beauty (2002)?

The article on Judith Campbell Exner claims that Natasha Henstridge played Exner in a 2002 film title Power and Beauty (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Exner#In_popular_culture). That film is not mentioned in the article on Henstridge. Why? Rammer (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Natasha Henstridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071105192656/http://www.ea.com:80/article.jsp?id=cnccast1030 to http://www.ea.com/article.jsp?id=cnccast1030

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Natasha Henstridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing HIV Reference

The claim in the intro paragraph that she has HIV is unsourced, and I can't find any evidence to support it in an admittedly quick search. Given that 2017 is also the year she accused Brett Ratner of sexual assault and the prevalence of trolls re: anyone associated with Me Too, I'm removing the line.

73.145.230.216 (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]