Talk:Natalie (website)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Natalie (website) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Natalie (website). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Natalie (website) at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Importance scale
[edit]From what I gather the importance scales are suppose to be set at "low" and then it is up to the project to change them accordingly. A bot will notify the projects that this article has been added, and that they need to review the importance scale. Alternatively, you could add {{DEFAULTSORT:Natalie (website}} and a bot will work out the scales for the project. Which method should be implemented in this case? Wesley☀Mouse 19:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- A list of what the importance scales mean can be found at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria#WikiProject importance assessments. From what that link reads, members of a project or external interests can scale the level of importance. Based on the article being of a specialised subject, its level would be low for WP:Media and WP:Journalism - as the guidance reads LOW = subject is mainly of specialist interest. I have left a copy of this conversation on the article's talk page. Wesley☀Mouse 20:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Natalie (website). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101216071419/http://business.nifty.com/articles/inside/101213/index.htm to http://business.nifty.com/articles/inside/101213/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070305033010/http://www.venturenow.jp/news/2007/02/01/1740_014091.html to http://www.venturenow.jp/news/2007/02/01/1740_014091.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class Websites articles
- Unknown-importance Websites articles
- Start-Class Websites articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Start-Class Media articles
- Unknown-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles