Talk:Nasodigitoacoustic syndrome/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 02:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will get started on this in depth tomorrow. Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 02:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty good so far, no major issues. Now combing for image problems or issues with MoS compliance. Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 22:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No period at the end of the X-chromosome caption. Doesn't form a complete sentence.

"Cited Literature" should be renamed to "Works or Publications" and moved above the references section.

The "et. al" and the dates when you refer to studies need to go. That information is available in the references and just clutters up the article.

Thank you for reviewing! Much appreciated :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an image available of the finger changes? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]