Jump to content

Talk:Nash Roberts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Nash is NOT a twin, he is the eldest son of Nash Charles Roberts, Sr and Winona Godson Roberts of New Orleans. His four brothers are Wallace James Roberts (my father), Clifford Clay Roberts, Arthur Claude "Ep" Roberts and Sidney Roberts. Ep passed away in late 2009. As of 3/20/2010 all the other brothers are still alive. Nash's wife Lydia passed away in 2007. Aytchr (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twin brother Ep Roberts

Why has no one mentioned that Nash is a twin? Ep Roberts lived on Cammie Ave. in Metairie years ago... http://www.neworleansradiotheatre.org/wdsuoncam3.html This is a brief blurb I was able to find out about Ep, but it does not confirm he is a twin. Nirigihimu 18:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nash was my mothers cousin. He and Ep were NOT twins.Neither was a stranger at my mothers house. 2603:8081:B03:ECF4:5440:4CFE:129A:4074 (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the edits of anon user at 209.214.106. as there seem to be some Wikipedia:Neutral point of view issues. No doubt the current article can be improved; it is best done so with sourced information. If some information is inaccurate, correct it, but do not replace one point of view with another. Comparing Nash Roberts to the "Easter Bunny" or other fictious characters is unencyclopedic and unhelpful. -- Infrogmation 21:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And again, after Infrogmation "undid" it once, the(probably the same) anonymous user had put the same sarcasim-laced opinion back. The "easter bunny" comment is utterly unencyclopedic and very much non-neutral. While this article is not perfect in the sense of complete and total neutrality, replacing a statement who's neutrality might be disputable with a blatent opinion laced with sarcasim is not helpful. If you think something needs better verification, flag it with a "fact" tag, but don't deface the article because you have a problem with it. --Fish Man 17:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anon editor kept putting in the same POV edits repeatedly. Edits from a rotating Bell South ip. After many reverts and attempts to discuss on talk pages, I've put a temporary "protection" on this article, no edits by anon or new users for 2 weeks. (I thought that was less drastic than blocking a whole range of ip#s which might cause collateral damage.) -- Infrogmation 16:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onenash.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Onenash.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, I believe. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nash Roberts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]