Jump to content

Talk:Naruto: The Broken Bond/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Kimimaro

i saw an interview with keith silverstein at a comic con or something where they asked him some questions about the game but he never stated that he was VA for the game so why does everyone assume that he's in the game? i mean he could have been there for unrelated reasons some interviewer saw him and decided to ask him questions about the game. unless the ubisoft website has more proof that i can't see because i can't get the flash player. but otherwise it's a bit premature putting him on there as a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.53.103.225 (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Contribution

The contribution I gave WAS FOR IMPROVING THE ARTICLE. Everything I typed was officially confirmed by Ubisoft, with sources. It was grammatically correct and well written (unlike your current main article), and laid out properly like all of your articles, ready to be used on the main page, I even have screenshots which it says you need. So why not accept my information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KristKP (talkcontribs) 00:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Forum postings are not reliable sources nor did you give any screenshots. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
I can't give screenshots because you need to be here for 4 days to do so. What if I posted the links to where I got the information in that forum post then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KristKP (talkcontribs) 00:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Unless it comes from a reliable source, the information isn't usable. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay then, I give up. I was only trying to help.

I know this is a forum post too, but it's from a member of Ubisoft with the official interview with the developers

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/5861045276/m/9401067876

You can also find this interview on many game news websites.

Also, the most recent trailer on their website (http://narutoxbox360game.us.ubi.com) confirms the extra characters in my list, the news announcement on the front page of their website about the pre-order bonus confirms that too, but you can also check gamestop.com and look up Naruto: The Boken Bond to see the same pre-order offer.

But, rules are rules. I understand and accept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KristKP (talkcontribs) 19:46, October 6, 2008

¿What happened?

All confirmed characters were removed even when you can see them fighting in the trailers ... THAT IS ABUSE FORM MODS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjaskcr (talkcontribs) 17:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

It is not "abuse from mods", seeing the characters in the trailers is NOT a confirmation that they are playable. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

http://images.gamersyde.com/gallery/public/9491/1706_0009.jpg - Tayuya in gameplay http://images.gamersyde.com/gallery/public/9491/1706_0001.jpg - Jiroubou in gameplay —Preceding unsigned comment added by KristKP (talkcontribs) 20:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Images can not be directly linked to as a reliable source. Nor is a gameplay image a valid source to say that YOU can play that character (could be an NPC). -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Here's a link with some information you can use:

http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/920/920393p1.html

30 Characters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KristKP (talkcontribs) 13:09, October 16, 2008

30 character confirmation

Its just been confirmed that 30 characters will be playable in the broken bond:[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pctopgs (talkcontribs) 02:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

A forum posting is not a reliable source.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Even if its from an official Ubisoft member on the official Ubisoft forum???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pctopgs (talkcontribs) 05:23, October 18, 2008

Generally a news source is better, and since the Gamespot article already says 30 playable, a forum post is not necessary. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Dudes what the hell.

why do you need proof when sakura kakashi jyria tsunade garra itachi are in it as characters it says. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonine (talkcontribs) 17:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Game Cover

Can this be used as the game cover instead of the one currently in use?[[2]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pctopgs (talkcontribs) 10:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, and done. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Editing Page

I was the one who wrote that whole thing on the development, and I would like to add a rewritten part on the gameplay. All the info I want to put is completely valid and with cited sources... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Defkism (talkcontribs) 16:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Video clips are not reliable sources for describing the game play, particularly for an unreleased game. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

The video was released by the game developer...How is it not reliable? And I wasn't planning on using a video for the gameplay, I was planning on using the Q&A from the developers that was posted on the official forum. They explain a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.90.99 (talk) 17:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Because you're interpreting what you see as to how the game is played, when it isn't a factual video, but an advertisement which may or may not accurately reflect game play. (how many times have you see a cool video game trailer but the game sucked :P). Using descriptions from reliable sources is a better and more accurate method.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Ok first, there was an article on IGN describing the multiplayer, and second, there are many questions on the official forum that describe aspects of the gameplay. Like I said above, I wasn't going to use a video for the gameplay description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.90.99 (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you aren't going to that's fine :P Now I'm confused...what was the original question? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)