Talk:Narluga
 | Cetaceans (inactive) | |||
| ||||
Wiki Education assignment: ECOL 4950- Senior Seminar
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GreenJadeNeocaridina (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ecokelbells, Ecogirly2001.
— Assignment last updated by Branchiobdellid (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To not merge, by analogy with Tigon. Klbrain (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Why does this need to be separate from Monodontidae, which only consists of two species anyway? FunkMonk (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- The family article has much more to discuss that just the hybrid. Or do you really want to just merge the hybrid article into the family article? - UtherSRG (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- The family article could be much longer, sure, but I don't see why this entire narluga article couldn't just be a section in the family article. It's basically about a single specimen, it's not a recurring hybrid. But to make matters worse, this article seems to be bloated by what is largely WP:synth. FunkMonk (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I say take a machete to the OR first and see what's left. At that point, yes, probably merge into the family article. (Current merge tags don't indicate in which direction...) - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like some of that text could actually be useful for general sections in the family article, as it talks about both species. FunkMonk (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Cool. Let's give this a week or so for others to weigh in, now that the articles have the merge tags, but I think this is a slam dunk. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it should stay separate like Tigon. Hmwith (talk) 15:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. -jakeyounglol (talk) 22:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think it should stay separate like Tigon. Hmwith (talk) 15:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cool. Let's give this a week or so for others to weigh in, now that the articles have the merge tags, but I think this is a slam dunk. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like some of that text could actually be useful for general sections in the family article, as it talks about both species. FunkMonk (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I say take a machete to the OR first and see what's left. At that point, yes, probably merge into the family article. (Current merge tags don't indicate in which direction...) - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- The family article could be much longer, sure, but I don't see why this entire narluga article couldn't just be a section in the family article. It's basically about a single specimen, it's not a recurring hybrid. But to make matters worse, this article seems to be bloated by what is largely WP:synth. FunkMonk (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.